The Club

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) ~ TB Chat ~ ·

 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Patient records for sale?

Whimsical Logic
post Mar 3 2009, 06:10 PM
Post #1


Professional Driver
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 8,859
Joined: 7-March 07
From: Norway
Member No.: 145





Confidential patient records could be passed from the NHS to government departments and private companies, leading to a "disastrous impact" on public health, medical organisations have warned.


by Rebecca Smith, Medical Editor
Last Updated: 6:33AM GMT 03 Mar 2009

Government plans, contained in the Coroners and Justice Bill, would allow almost unlimited access to medical records of named individuals without their consent.

Under the proposals, patient information held by GPs, health centres, pharmacists and hospitals could be passed to insurance companies or research organisations. The data could also be given to other government departments, such as the Department for Work and Pensions to check whether people who claimed benefits were able to work.

In a letter to Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, medical organisations expressed "grave concerns" about the Bill. They said that sharing confidential health records would result in patients being less open with their doctors, which would jeopardise their care and public health initiatives.

Dr Hamish Meldrum, chairman of council at the British Medical Association (BMA), said: "The doctor-patient relationship is based on trust. If patients cannot be 100 per cent sure that their records are confidential, they will inevitably be reluctant to share vital information with their doctor.

"The Justice Secretary has indicated that he is willing to amend this legislation to protect a person's right to confidentiality. We welcome the fact that he is taking people's concerns on board, and hope he will provide assurances that confidential health information will be exempt."

The BMA said that if an elderly patient was abused in a care home, he or she might not tell their doctors because the information could be sold to a private company and lead to the care home finding out.

In addition, some professionals might not seek help for drink or drug addictions for fear of losing their jobs.

Some medical data is already shared, but patients remain anonymous and the information is strictly controlled for administration and research purposes.

Spine, the new electronic medical records system, which allows all doctors access to a patient's records, will be particularly attractive to private data holding organisations.

At present, medical records can only be viewed by health care professionals involved directly in the patient's care. Some data can be kept confidential and only seen by others with the patient's express consent.

The letter to Mr Straw was signed by leaders of the BMA, the Royal College of General Practitioners, the Royal College of Surgeons, and the Royal College of Nursing and medical defence organisations.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "Sharing data is essential for the delivery of efficient and effective joined-up public services to tackle crime, protect the public and to help everyone get access to new opportunities, developments and support."

However, a spokesman for the Department of Health said: "We are currently in discussion with the Ministry of Justice about how the proposed legislation impacts on medical records.

"It is important to ensure that patient confidentiality is preserved and that patients consent to how their records are used."

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthne...nt-records.html


I am more than a little bit shocked to read this. *shudders*

Whimsy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kezz
post Mar 3 2009, 10:00 PM
Post #2


Professional Driver
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 4,229
Joined: 18-November 06
From: Sunny Melbourne Australia
Member No.: 24



QUOTE
"The doctor-patient relationship is based on trust. If patients cannot be 100 per cent sure that their records are confidential, they will inevitably be reluctant to share vital information with their doctor.



He is correct, people would be extremely reluctant to share anything at all.. they may not even go to the doctors.


--------------------


user posted image

It's the world's best day, and guess what? Hooray we're in it!

user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pete
post Mar 4 2009, 12:08 AM
Post #3


Professional Driver
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 20,421
Joined: 18-March 06
From: Northampton, England
Member No.: 1



This is the disgusting government we are stuck with until the next election.
I have always distrusted politicians of every party. They seem to trample over even the basic principles of our privacy. Even when they DO try to keep something private, a lacky will lose/sell/misplace a laptop of memory stick containing personal details of thousands upon thousands of people. Strangely, no-one has yet lost details of how deep they have stuck their noses into the trough of public money.

I HATE this government with such venom.


--------------------





user posted image
I find that a duck's opinion of me is very much influenced by whether or not I have bread.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Durbs
post Mar 10 2010, 01:17 AM
Post #4


Professional Driver
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 911
Joined: 1-January 07
From: Qld, Australia
Member No.: 134



They certainly sound a Government full of deception. no.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th September 2010 - 07:25 PM

Forum Skin: Skyscape by Jan.